This land called Jamaica, free as a bird since 1962 for those in high places to wheel the pendulum at any given angle that suits them. What does it take to rub shoulders with senior politicians, senior retired police officers? Become a lawyer, doctor, business executive of a Fortune xxxxx company on the Roc? I dare say not all of the above are equal. I will not include attorneys in the mix nor personal friends as for one attorneys collect a paycheck. Unless they declare their services are free of cost for a particular defendant. Friends are just that, their support you would hope to be different from the masses.
Based on the details provided in this case, it makes not one drop of sense to me. Firstly why would the good Doctor assume that the police would kill these foreigners? Has he experienced this personally before? What connection does he have with these foreigners that would cause him to put his neck on the chopping block? Why go through all this trouble to incriminate himself? Was he an undercover operative for the JCF? According to the good Doctor as he says below,
“Ford told the court, during the trial, that he was trying to assist the Surinamese men by preventing them from remaining into custody, because he feared they were going to be killed by the police.
He also indicated that he knew that he was being recorded but did it to “draw out corrupt cops”.
Who asked him to undergo a test to see if the officers in question would be caught hook line and sinker? Was he bored with his life up to that point and decided he wanted to inject some excitement into it? What is the real connection between him and those foreigners? Does anyone find the details of this case and the present destination to be odd to say the least?
Here comes the senior politician and retired ACP to give character reference nonetheless outlining the wonders of the good Doctor. Have you ever noticed when the police kills a criminal in a shoot-out, there is always a friend or two plus some family members who declare the person was the equivalent of a saint? What is the difference with this case and all the others that pass through our court system? High society JA style………….
We have been here before I dare say. When the elites of this country according to who make up their professional and social circle fall prey to illegal or criminal activity, the audience becomes difference. Let me be very clear when I say the ‘elites’. These ‘elites’ could be white collar as well as blue collar or the plain undesirables, simply due to their connections. ‘Connections/links’ determine ‘elite’ status in our justice system from my perspective. Cut the chase and I make no bones about it. Justice will always be subjective, interpretative, and prejudicial based on the player and their team on the Roc. Their team in and outside of the court room are one of the same. Our prosecution arm will forever be ‘salt’. Instead of all this ‘hoopla’. Why was it not recommended for the good Doctor to plead guilty based on the evidence? If this was his first offense then according to the law based on the crime, an agreeable punishment could be arrived at. No, no no…………………We need to display the E.E.E. (Extra, Excess and Exalted). All at the expense of tax payers. This case has been 3 years in the making with said guilty verdict at present destination, awaiting final destination.
Which politician said and I paraphrase……….’ those who play by the rules get shafted’? One blogger’s comment below on the article.
I am a poor man from St. Catherine Central who voted for you in the last election. I stole some ackees from a tree on the grounds of Kings House the other day and now find myself in the lockup at Half Way Tree as I did not have any money to offer the officer to “draw out corrupt cops”. I am also lacking a ‘brand name lawyer’ to keep me out of prison.
My court date is coming up and I would like to give you my side of the story so you can give a statement to the court on my behalf. Should I be expecting your visit or will a dog be nyammin my supper ?
Barefoot dutty trousers man
All information provided on this blog is read by you of your own risk. Any material extracted it is done of your own free will.
I am the legal copyright owner of the material provided on this blog. Therefore such cannot be used, reprinted without the consent of the owner The material provided is purely for entertainment purposes and not recommended for readers to treat as gospel. Information that is not of my opinion is readily available as the source of content is accessible. I reserve the right to shut down this blog, change the focus at my discretion. At no time will I share personal contact information to any entity, company or platform.
Any letters to the editor, tweets, emails will be used as feedback, reference for commentary if deemed necessary. The writer of those will be the owner.
Email email@example.com with your comments
‘Babsy’ begs for Ford
Gov’t minister says giving medical doctor jail time would be ‘traumatic’
(Jamaica Observer) Saturday, October 28, 2017 89 Comments
IN an appeal to Judge Simone Wolfe-Reece yesterday, Minister of Culture, Gender Affairs, Entertainment and Sport Olivia “Babsy” Grange asked her to spare medical doctor Jephthah Ford from jail time.
In fact, while speaking in the Kingston and St Andrew Parish Court as a character witness at Ford’s sentencing hearing, Grange said she believed it would be extremely “traumatic” for hundreds of Jamaicans if he were given prison time.
The minister was one of three character witnesses, including retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Garnet Daley and medical doctor Donovan Calder, that took the stand on Ford’s behalf yesterday.
The politician, who took the witness stand and described Ford as a caring person who has saved many lives and provided free health care to countless individuals, admitted yesterday that she was a “little emotional”.
She said that, despite their political affiliations, Grange being a member of the Jamaica Labour Party and Ford a former People’s National Party politician, he is her family doctor.
The minister explained that Ford was the one who diagnosed her late mother with stage-four cancer, after the doctors in Canada, where she was residing, were unable to detect what was wrong with her.
Grange said she felt responsible to give evidence in support of Ford spite of her busy schedule.
Dr Ford’s bail was extended after the judge said she needed time to consider Samuels’ request.
Prior to the adjournment, Samuels, pointed out that he is prepared to “sacrifice own self”.
Ford was convicted of perverting the course of justice on October 25, 2017.
In 2014, he was arrested and charged after he attempted to bribe a police officer to release two Surinamese men who had been caught with nearly $60 million. He also requested the return of the confiscated funds.
During the 10-day trial that started in May, prosecutor Joel Brown led evidence that Ford was caught on camera offering a percentage of the money seized to a police officer in exchange for the release of the men and the funds.
The two foreigners — Roshen Daniels and Murvin Reingould — were held after police intercepted a motor vehicle on Half-Way-Tree Road in St Andrew on April 7 and found US$533,886 and J$1.3 million.
The men were later taken to their apartment where the police seized an additional US$3,000, J$700 and 55 Surinamese dollars.
The two were subsequently charged with possession of criminal property and conspiracy to possess criminal property, but were freed of the charges when they appeared in court.
Dr Ford had contacted the officer while the men were in custody and requested a meeting to discuss the case.
During the meeting, Ford was captured on camera asking for the case against the men to be dismissed.
Ford told the court, during the trial, that he was trying to assist the Surinamese men by preventing them from remaining into custody, because he feared they were going to be killed by the police.
He also indicated that he knew that he was being recorded but did it to “draw out corrupt cops”.
Before Grange took the stand yesterday, both Daley and Calder had already given evidence.
Daley, who said he came in contact with Ford while he was assigned to the Constant Spring Police Station, testified that he had known Ford for 40 years.
He said he met Ford when he was a detective inspector and testified that during his tenure at the station Ford would assist the police with sick prisoners and police officers who were injured.
The retired cop explained that for more than 20 years Ford would have treated police officers at his office if the environment at the Kingston Public Hospital (KPH) was not safe.
“I recalled an officer who was shot and he was rushed to KPH — and this was the time when the vicinity of the KPH was very volatile — and I called Dr Ford and he rushed to KPH, where he examined him and transferred him to St Andrew Hospital, and that patient became his patient at that time,” Daley said.
Samuels, during the examination-in-chief, asked Daley if there were any other medical doctors in the vicinity who would offer such services.
“I can’t recall,” Daley replied.
“How would you view that?” Samuels asked Daley.
“[As] a good gesture,” Daley replied.
Daley told the court that Ford still maintains a good rapport with individuals in the community.
On cross-examination, the prosecutor questioned Daley’s relationship with the medical doctor.
“For 20 years most of your interaction would be working?” the prosecutor asked.
“Yes, and I would see him from time to time,” Daley replied.
In the meantime, Calder, who was an intern at the Spanish Town Hospital when he met Dr Ford, testified that he is a reliable, forthright, and strongly opinionated individual, especially on medical and political matters.
“He is the kind of person who will not stand by and see injustice being done,” Calder said, adding that Ford persuaded him to give back to society as he is a philanthropist.